Subject: Re: Retiring 'ss*' and PINT in favour of SANE
To: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
From: Roger Brooks <R.S.Brooks@liverpool.ac.uk>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/17/2000 11:38:27
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Roger Brooks wrote:
>
>> I tried this over the weekend. With the two lines which prevent an
>> ioctl on minor 0 commented out it worked OK with my Mustek Scanexpress
>> 6000.
>
> Stunning :)
> For now I'll commit this to -current and ask releng for a pullup
> for 1.4.2.
> Can someone describe the exact error message form ss* without
> the patch so I can put together an FAQ entry (which will tell
> people to use 1.4.2 :)
The machine is at home, but if no-one else beats me to it I'll boot the
old kernel and get the error message this evening. I *think* it's
probably strerror( ENOTTY ), but will check.
The frustrating thing is that I send-pr'ed this about 9 months ago, together
with several null pointer problems in ss. The null pointer dereferences
were fixed in 1.4, but the ioctl problem seems to have dropped through the
cracks. But I suppose it's my own fault for putting two fixes in the same PR!
Roger
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Brooks (Systems Programmer), | Email: R.S.Brooks@liv.ac.uk
Computing Services Dept, | Tel: +44 151 794 4441
The University of Liverpool, | Fax: +44 151 794 4442
PO Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------