On 16 Oct 2000, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:

> Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org> writes:
> > What do you mean by "a direct-config variant of ISA" that makes it
> > different from what upc (or amiga supio) currently uses (if anything)?
> 
> uh, it's probably pretty much the same.  it's a matter of location and
> intent (and to some degree, name).

Right, so is your problem with there being a separate batch of bus
attachments for each type of multi-I/O chip?  If so, would an MI version
of the amiga supio stuff be acceptable?

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>