Subject: Re: open_as vs fuid
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
From: Brett Lymn <blymn@baesystems.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/06/2000 15:51:46
According to Warner Losh:
>
>I'd still like to know why code like the following won't work.
>
> euid = geteuid();
> seteuid(getuid());
> <stuff>
> seteuid(euid);
>
>See my previous message for the details as to why I think this will
>work.
>
I am not sure about NetBSD but I have tried this idea on a SunOS
machine and found that some things were checking the ruid regardless
of what the euid was set to (or something like that), and if I tried
setting the ruid then I could not get back to a privileged state. In
the end I just forked a copy of the program, made all the (r,e)uid's
the unprivileged id and ran what I needed to. I am not implying that
NetBSD is similarly broken just that this may have caused people to
discard the idea...just a thought.
--
===============================================================================
Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, BAE SYSTEMS
===============================================================================