On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:55:39AM -0800, Konrad Schroder wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> 
> > Yes, LFS is very good for loads like this.
> > Hum, I'd try a very recent -current with all the LFS fixes to
> > see if it helps. Porting these fixes to 1.5 shouldn't be hard.
> 
> Yes, I hope to have all of this pulled up to the 1.5 branch as soon as the
> release engineering team reopens the pullup queue.  In the meantime,
> today's -current versions of /usr/src/sys/ufs/lfs/* can replace the 1.5
> versions and run, if after copying the files over you apply the enclosed
> patch (or "cvs update -j1.45 -j1.44 lfs_vnops.c") to back out the fsync
> api change that didn't make it into 1.5.

There's a lfs_cleanerd change needed as well, isn't it ?

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--