Subject: Re: LFS v2 layout
To: Konrad Schroder <perseant@hhhh.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@zembu.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/08/2000 10:56:08
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Konrad Schroder wrote:
> True ... but we will have to go to v3 when there is a ufs inode format
> that has 64-bit time quantities on it, so there's time yet. :^)
No, you should include the ufs inode verison number as a parameter in the
superblock, as does ffs. That way changing the ufs inode doesn't mean
changing the lfs version. :-)
Take care,
Bill