Subject: Re: _KERNEL_foo
To: None <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@sibyte.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/13/2000 13:36:30
Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com> writes:
> On 13 Dec 2000, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> # (Things that come to mind recently have been the line discipline
> # changes, and the watchdog interface. The latter, especially, annoys
> # me, because (1) as far as I can tell, it simply wasn't discussed; (2)
> # as you'll see if you read the ex post facto discussion here, from
> # people who've been playing with watchdogs for a while, it's simply not
> # sufficient.)
>
> 1) WHAT line discipline changes? (Subject, please?)
search the list archives. "source-changes line discipline"
also:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2000/11/02/0005.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2000/11/02/0006.html
> 2) Watchdog interface? I remember something about a kernel-userland
> watchdog interface a while back, but nothing came of it, at least
> not publicly. There was some discussion, but no final decision.
Uh, there were:
* jason thorpe's commits (which were, as far as I know, on an
un-discussed interface).
* http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2000/11/04/0007.html
* and then various followups to that where lots of people (starting
with me 8-) said, "uh, that isn't such a good interface."
cgd