On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:35:12AM +0000, Steve Woodford wrote:

 > Are there any objections to changing struct emul's e_name field from
 > 
 > 	char e_name[8];
 > to
 > 	const char *e_name;
 > 
 > Cheers, Steve

Doing that would cause you to have to do two kvm reads (one to get emul,
one to get emul->e_name), but even so, I think it's the right thing to do.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>