>> I'm not yet dealing with bridges in my code.  I have no real way to
>> test that, and I'm not sure how that would fit into where I am
>> placing it right now (at bus attachment).  I could try to work that
>> up without a way to test it, but what I have now is useful,
>> functional, and even required for the Sandpoint port.

> I disagree.  A fair number of PCI *cards* have bridges on them these
> days.

So?  A Sandpoint port that doesn't work with them but does work with
"plain" cards is a lot more useful - to people working with Sandpoints
- than no Sandpoint port at all.

Or is this another "the good is the enemy of the best" argument?

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B