Allen Briggs <briggs@wasabisystems.com> writes:
> Yeah.  This is the least ugly thing that I could come up with, except I
> had -1 be the end of the probe since I don't see how it makes sense for
> that to be a sparse array.

yeah, that'd work too.

(I suggested what i did because having an always-the-same-size and
all-entries-valid array might be slightly prettier.  certainly means
you need to check one less thing in the code that loops over it.)


cgd