On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 07:05:44PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:

 > > There are many more ARM boards in existance than the CATS that use
 > > Footbridge, eh?
 > 
 > Yes, but are they otherwise sufficiently different from the CATS as to
 > justify their own MACHINE?

Possibly, yes.  They may boot completely differently, for example.

 > That sounds reasonable, but it does tend towards recreating quite a lot of
 > sys/arch/arm32 (and sys/arch/arm26 for that matter) under
 > sys/arch/arm.  This may not be a bad thing.

Uh, arch/arm32 and arch/arm26 should probably go away in favor of arch/arm,
and the rename I suggested happen.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>