On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 01:04:08PM +1100, matthew green wrote:

 >    1.5 32MB
 >    3126.891u 596.892s 2:00:53.25 51.3%     0+0k 151929+207357io 25155pf+0w
 >    
 >    -current+balancing 32MB
 >    3253.558u 723.490s 1:39:03.70 66.9%     0+0k 10687+30709io 14532pf+0w
 > 
 > 
 > wow, this is quite impressive.
 > 
 > 
 > the question in my mind is why did it use up ~252 seconds more of
 > actual CPU?  that seems not insignificant.  particular the system
 > time has risen significantly.

Err.. you'll note that with UBC, it does significantly fewer I/O
operations...

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>