gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> writes:
> I have definitely NOT been following all of this, and perhaps I'm
> being dumb here, but if only one of aux and the property struct will
> ever be filled by a child, then having the child point the other at
> NULL before returning and the print function printing whichever !=
> NULL seems like a not entirely unelegant kludge. To me, at least.

The pointers in question are all pass-by-value parameters.



cgd