eeh@netbsd.org writes:

> We seem to have sys_sbrk() and sys_sstk() that don't seem to do
> anything.  Why are we keeping them?

As both Perry and I observed quite a while ago, there doesn't seem to
be a compelling reason to do so.  In fact, the amount of discussion
actually related to this particular question in the whole thread seems
to indicate this. :-)


- Klaus