Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removal of brk()/sbrk().
To: None <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: Nathan J. Williams <nathanw@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/04/2002 11:55:13
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com> writes:

> And if they're not "examples", why are they in our distribution?

There's an entire class of configurations in our source tree that seem
to be there for vanity purposes only. I'm of the opinion that they
should be deleted with prejudice.

Having the configurations for Project server machines is sort of cute,
but I doubt they're up to date, and they should probably go, too.

        - Nathan