> stable branch (1.5.2 or maybe 1.5.3_ALPHA) since this must
> be a highly reliable system.
>
> in this relation please tell me about LogFS status in those
> releases - mean maturity/stability and speed.
>
> comparatively to ffs+softdeps in "some-big-files" and
> "lot-of-small-files" scenarios would be nice.
when reading lfs is generally worse a little in most cases.
in big files ffs and lfs has similar speed. with lot-of-small-files
lfs is much faster on writes.