--T7mxYSe680VjQnyC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:23:31AM +0900, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > For starters, the code as a result of the patch doesn't even vaguely
> > > conform to KNF (wraps badly on an 80 column screen).
> >=20
> > If you look at those (5?) lines extending 80 characters you'll see that
> > breaking them KNF conformant will make them even more unreadable. And I=
 don't
> > think I'd like to put them into a separate function.
>=20
> IMHO, deep indentation depth makes source unreadable quite a lot.
> And the patch is long enough to be put into a separate function.

That's what I've been taught to consider in this case.
=09
	-is

--T7mxYSe680VjQnyC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPI+DUTCn4om+4LhpAQFr8wf+K6htI3ATlUCNVDzJPnSYDnMucliov+V2
9rrtnl7pcW92FPK5UboPvmXvq96CQngJoMaZlWIswx++Eg/cjFuH5SVEn9jR6M9Y
F0Emj6pbyH9D8/xpAT4vpPoW3UEPAUuLzSU8VrZ8IFdgrRaUg6GftZBN3yy2+QNb
xha+IzO8i5tmAt+/eIta0ew+plZiSYfsXgxlenv8Rzu/oNew972+oHoI/yfiNWcN
9xopQZLImtCXED3eBvNYAKGtIndFhLU0Al8SalqYX4wh8cCPXM/3yd2vEa326ZmQ
bJWhuFD1wOGifTmDf01M527/jpj0vUNkqRmW6mL/Guh2EhSpocBUhw==
=8jYs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--T7mxYSe680VjQnyC--