> hmmm.  i think i agree.  please move the "userlevel" handling
> part of sys_swapctl() into a support function.  don't like the
> name above, perhaps call it swap_user()... (but be sure to post
> changes and get OK from some other UVM-type as well.)

I proposed the name 'sys_swapctl1' to follow a quite widespread
convention in the kernel. We already have sigpending1, exit1(),
uvm_km_free_poolpage1(), fork1(), and so on.

Why another naming scheme?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Quel est le meilleur moyen d'accelerer un PC?
- 9,81 m/s^2
manu@netbsd.org