Subject: Re: Adding a size parameter to stackgap_init()
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/17/2002 18:39:06
> I understand that. But in the future that might be allowed, with a differ=
ent
> implementation of stackgap.
How could we implement stackgap differently? The only idea that comes to
me is to use the bottom of the stack (I mean where sp point to). But
there must be a reason why it is not done that way. What is the
drawback?
--=20
Emmanuel Dreyfus.
Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows Millenium
D=E9sormais, les OS portent la date de peremption dans leurs noms.
manu@netbsd.org