In article <1f97d1i.1s2w50d1y5olgfM@[10.0.12.137]>,
Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org> wrote:
>> I understand that. But in the future that might be allowed, with a different
>> implementation of stackgap.
>
>How could we implement stackgap differently? The only idea that comes to
>me is to use the bottom of the stack (I mean where sp point to). But
>there must be a reason why it is not done that way. What is the
>drawback?

That is what I meant. I don't know what the drawback is.

christos