I thought this had been fixed in current.

    -- Lennart

Neil Ludban wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've got an HP LaserJet 2200d attaching as a generic USB device,
> looks like the same problem as this message found in the archives
> (for an HP 1200se, IIRC).  ulpt.c (in 1.5.2) is dated 2000/06/01,
> apparently this was never fixed.
>
> To summarize the earlier messages in thread, the HP provides 3
> interfaces: 1284.4 packetized, bi-directional, and uni-directional.
> The ulpt driver doesn't support the first, and the match routine
> doesn't continue searching for others.
>
> Would any USB gurus be kind enough to provide a quick patch, or
> point me at some more examples (a couple readings through the
> ulpt attach routine hasn't clued me yet).
>
> Thanks-
>
>         -Neil
>
> > Subject: Re: HP USB interface confuration error; quirk needed?
> > To: Nathan J. Williams <nathanw@MIT.EDU>
> > From: Lennart Augustsson <lennart@mail.augustsson.net>
> > List: tech-kern
> > Date: 06/27/2001 00:46:09
> >
> > Hmm, I think the ulpt match routine needs changing so that it looks
> > through the alternate settings.  The attach already does it.
> >
> >     -- Lennart
> >
> >
> > "Nathan J. Williams" wrote:
> >
> > > nathanw@MIT.EDU (Nathan J. Williams) writes:
> > >
> > > > Second, the configuration descriptor listed "bNumInterface=1", but
> > > > then three interface descriptors followed. I think that this is
> > > > incorrect on the part of HP, but I'm not 100% sure about the semantics
> > > > of this bit of data.
> > >
> > > Scratch that; I re-read the USB spec, and saw the difference between
> > > "Interface Descriptor Number" and "Interface Number".  They're
> > > alternate interfaces. I will now go see why we don't seem to deal with
> > > those...
> > >
> > >         - Nathan