Yes, this is good IMO.

On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> Hi,
> would anyone object if I rename the per-channel scsipi kernel thread from
> controller:channel to the scsipi channel name (e.g. siop0:0 -> scsibus0,
> ahc0:1 -> scsibus1, pciide0:0 -> atapibus0, etc ...) ?
> 
> This would allow controllers that need per-channel thread for their own use
> to create them with an appropriate name.
> 
> -- 
> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
> --
>