> Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net> wrote:
>
> > LFS is impressive on writes. not reads
>
> Well indeed, I find that FFS is generally fast on reads already, file creation/deletion are what seem to be slow on it, LFS tends to fix that fortunately...
>
once i tried LFS on /usr and reads ARE slower. not much but they are.