On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 06:48:00AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:

 > > LFS is impressive on writes. not reads
 > 
 > Well indeed, I find that FFS is generally fast on reads already, file creation/deletion are what seem to be slow on it, LFS tends to fix that fortunately...

Actually, LFS can be quite good on reads, too, assuming an application
is smart about how it writes out a file... If the file's blocks are all
laid out in a linear fashion...

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>