Subject: Re: DTYPE_SYSTRACE -> DTYPE_MISC
To: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/16/2002 09:54:22 
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:43:06AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:

 > Rather than DTYPE_MISC, how about DTYPE_OPAQUE which really denotes that
 > you can't see into it.

Because the object isn't an "opaque", it's a "misc. object".  I.e.
"vnode", "socket", "pipe", "other".

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>