Subject: Re: allowing unpriv users to bind to priv ports
To: Joe Reed <jnr@po.cwru.edu>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/26/2002 02:57:43
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 08:49:49PM -0400, Joe Reed wrote:
>=20
> also, what if we wish to add a new protocol? currently it's just
> adding a flag or 2 and adding the corresponding entries into the
> switch statements. do we really want to add this much to /dev/ ?? i
> think the implementation may be to simpler to use a rule-based
> approach instead of /dev/ports/*.
after thinking about it a bit more, it doesn't look that good anymore.
if nothing else 262145 taken inodes is a.. drawback :). luke's idea
seems more usable and simple in one.
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\=
--
-- <salo@silcnet.org> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ /=
--
-- Microsoft proprietary formats X =
--
-- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \=
--
-- Key Fingerprint: 75B2 2B96 CD75 0385 1C49 39B8 8B08 C30E 54BC 7263 =
--
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE9kluGiwjDDlS8cmMRAoAGAJ9ra4+2QL+Z+1NDGuzj8iqW33SuigCeMcd0
aHPPT7stwsgqiqdALEz49Gk=
=hYhZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--