# >On the other hand, I don't really think that adding a new keyword like
# >"orphan" is a natural way to describe a system's devie configuration.
# >
# >What are people's thoughts on this?
#

How does it work now?  Does it collect all the information first and
then decide what is orphaned, or does it process it serially, thus making
something like

sd* at scsibus? target ? lun ?
scsibus* at ahc?

illegal?

[I would hope it had been constructed more intelligently, but if not,
that's my suggestion...]

...at which point I second the recommendation that orphaned devices
be turned into warnings.


				--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: What do you want to serve today?