Subject: Re: chmod & symlink broken in 1.6
To: Matthew Mondor <mmondor@gobot.ca>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/29/2002 14:42:32
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:40:28AM -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote:
>=20
> Well, permissions are then set on the symbolic link, not the files
> they point to, precisely. Because the permissions of the link itself
> may become relevant with symperm enabled mounts.

shouldn't it work this way when symperm is enabled and the way hubertf
said (an i agree with him) when it's not?  otherwise it doesn't make
sense to me.

regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>   ASCII Ribbon campaign against  /"\=
 --
--                  <salo@silcnet.org>   e-mail in gratuitous HTML and  \ /=
 --
--                                       Microsoft proprietary formats   X =
 --
-- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp                                  / \=
 --
-- Key Fingerprint: 75B2 2B96 CD75 0385 1C49  39B8 8B08 C30E 54BC 7263     =
 --

--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9vpBIiwjDDlS8cmMRAs7BAJ41gV6Lgz79WqdkgkOj9VDlBg14VACfVP1x
Dc2u6CpC19XnNS8I/e8g2LI=
=6qTi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef--