Subject: Re: chmod & symlink broken in 1.6
To: Matthew Mondor <mmondor@gobot.ca>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/29/2002 14:42:32
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:40:28AM -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote:
>=20
> Well, permissions are then set on the symbolic link, not the files
> they point to, precisely. Because the permissions of the link itself
> may become relevant with symperm enabled mounts.
shouldn't it work this way when symperm is enabled and the way hubertf
said (an i agree with him) when it's not? otherwise it doesn't make
sense to me.
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\=
--
-- <salo@silcnet.org> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ /=
--
-- Microsoft proprietary formats X =
--
-- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \=
--
-- Key Fingerprint: 75B2 2B96 CD75 0385 1C49 39B8 8B08 C30E 54BC 7263 =
--
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE9vpBIiwjDDlS8cmMRAs7BAJ41gV6Lgz79WqdkgkOj9VDlBg14VACfVP1x
Dc2u6CpC19XnNS8I/e8g2LI=
=6qTi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef--