Subject: Re: stopping childs (patch included)
To: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org>
From: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/06/2002 09:18:22
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
# Why you need next N stopped? I think it's perfectly OK
# to have it just a flag - 'stop child after fork' and 'stop after exec'.
# No need for counter.
I'm not a full-fledged engineer, but this approach seems sensible to me.
Bits should do fine for this; decrement stuff seems like overkill.
--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: daemonic power.