Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org> writes:
> > It appeared there is no serious objection against the sleep.
> 
> If you think that our comments to the effect that we don't want it
> constitute "no objection", then what WOULD be an objection?

Bill & you commented _after_ commit, so obviously I could not
take it into account _before_ the commit.

Can you please explain your objection, other than "don't want it"?

The sleep thing is smart & simple solution to tough problem. I don't
see how it could cause any new problem. So I currently don't see why
to not have it there.

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.org/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric    -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''     -=-