Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org> writes:
> Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org> writes:
> 
> > The sleep thing is smart & simple solution to tough problem. I don't
> > see how it could cause any new problem. So I currently don't see why
> > to not have it there.
> 
> It also only occurs in the case where a process is trying to exceed
> its limit.

You mean like, perhaps, a system already on the edge of collapse where
the delays will make the collapse worse, as has already been explained
by others?

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com