>>    would anyone object to the attached change ?
>>    It makes all the attached scsibusses sleep "in parallel" instead
>>    of sequencially, which is a real win for machines with several
>>    SCSI busses.
> There is one issue with this.  If you don't wire down your scsi
> devices in your config file, they may get attached in random order.

It seems to me that's only if you _probe_ them in parallel.  As long as
the actual probing is serialized and done in a predictable order, there
should be no problem with doing the two-second sleeps in parallel.

At least as far as I can see.

Whether the proposed change does that, I haven't looked at it in enough
detail to say.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B