--NVZ4M1l8awdqSrjc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:39:36AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> One thing I didn't mention is that the old pid allocation code is
> actually at least o(n^2) in the number of allocated pids.
> The new code is o(1).

Do you actually mean little-o? If so, what's your k? (How many procs
need to exist before the algorithm's o(1)?)

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--NVZ4M1l8awdqSrjc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+df4I9ehacAz5CRoRAqzWAKCDOCawfii0aRqYqGRTIBrLoPxNzwCfds9u
ejTOAuxwK7Lc2lUfujX1gwI=
=uvAa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NVZ4M1l8awdqSrjc--