In article <200303210833.h2L8XWH09873@s102-n054.tele2.cz>,
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org> wrote:
>
>I'm not sure if it's bug or intended, but I noticed NO_PGID
>is defined as
>
>	(-(pid_t)1)
>
>shouldn't it be
>	((pid_t)-1)
>
>Maybe it even doesn't make any difference, but the latter for is
>more readable IMHO.

Yes, it should. It does not make a difference right now, but it should
be changed.

christos