Subject: Re: Some LFS vs. FFS+softdep testresults
To: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@netbsd.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/02/2003 05:12:39
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Frank van der Linden wrote:
> A preliminary conclusion is that LFS is now pretty stable for normal
> usage (although I didn't create any disk-nearly-full situations
> which make LFS' life hard), and then it does quite well. The write
> case is worth some investigation.
What about NFS-exporting LFS? Seems this didn't work at all in 1.6(.x),
and I thus had to move some disks back to UFS recently. :(
- Hubert
--
Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
* Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial.html
* Setup -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial.html
Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD.org/