At Wed, 14 May 2003 21:30:42 +0000 (UTC), "Jonathan Stone" wrote:
> The code is ...  hideous.  Sure, lets do strl{cpy,cat}, but why
> not start with a clean readable, KNF-compliant implementation?

Err, perhaps i've been exposed to too much GNU-coding-standard code
lately, but...

What in particular is wrong with the code itojun posted, KNF-wise?


(It looks hideous to me, but then, i've actually come to like the
GNU-coding-standard style.  8-)


cgd