On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:58:44AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> 
>    > > Are you going to 'fix' sh then?
>    > 
>    > Uhm, I thought our sh doesn't use vfork() because it has issues.
>    
>    They are all (or at least all the known ones are) fixed.
> 
> 
> the point remains that /bin/sh has been using fork() not vfork() for 
> basiaclly the entire life of netbsd... the few attempts at changing
> this have so far all failed.  sh doesn't need 'fixing'.

The current /bin/sh uses vfork(), I know - I fixed some of the bugs!

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk