Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On the other hand, reserving a range of major numbers for "local" use 
> would be useful; I'm sure I've seen this requested in the past.
> 
> What if we reserved 192-255 for local use and 256+ for MI use?

See my #2 reasoning for why I chose 192 and not 256 as start of MI
range :) It's fine to reserve range for 'local' use, but not in
'precious' <256 range. Say top 256 of current 16bit range, i.e.
65280-65535?

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.cz/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric    -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''     -=-