On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 11:20  AM, Paul Kranenburg wrote:

> If so, what about say a-synchronous memory errors that are not 
> necessarily
> related to a thread's execution sequence?

If a memory error is asynchronous, you would never generate a signal 
for it, right?  You might log an error to the console, or something, 
but I don't understand how you could even select which process to send 
the signal to if it were truly asynchronous.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>