--Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday, 11 October 2003 at  9:28:52 +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 October 2003 at  0:27:02 +0200, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
>> Bill Studenmund wrote:
>>> I like Luke's less-prefered choice of having local ones 144-159 and
>>> having MI ones from 160 on up. Mainly as we will keep adding devices over
>>> time, and eventually we will get past 256.
>>
>> Okay, should we flip a coin? :) Anyway, this makes sense indeed.
>>
>> I'll make it so - 144-159 local/distr and 160+ new-style, and
>> change crypto&pf (and vinum) to use 160, 161 & 162.
>
> To avoid any further surprises, note that Vinum has a block major as
> well.  I'd give the same number to both.  This marginally favours
> giving Vinum 160 so that both major numbers are the same.  Any
> objections?

OK, I've caught up on my commit traffic now.  Never mind.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.

--Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/h3MxIubykFB6QiMRAiZhAJ9dY9E2TEIc4H5EcV9fpA/JUS2ArgCfR8HS
mOCwBODqZksQEq1CeBlpRBI=
=oNce
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG--