Subject: Re: Dynamic registry of ehternet frame types
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/12/2003 07:47:10
On Nov 11, 2003, at 11:49 PM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> This has the additional advantage that it enables LKMs to register and
> handler
> additional ethernet frame types. It would not affect the efficiency of
> hardwired frame types.
>
> Do you think this is worth the effort?
Yes. I would actually like to see the entire input path use
dynamically-registered handlers, and eliminate that big switch
statement entirely.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>