Matthew Orgass <darkstar@city-net.com> wrote:

>   It looks like you really want to intercept the signal before it gets to
> the standard signal handling.  What is the problem with adding an
> emulation specific call to do exactly that? (which should be for
> kpsignal2, actually).

And in trapsignal() too. I proposed this in another mail. The only issue
is that it introduce an extra test in native code path. 

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent 
le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
manu@netbsd.org