Subject: Re: NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY
To: None <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/05/2003 20:23:12
hi,

> On Dec 3, 2003, at 5:38 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> 
> > because synchronous writes, which nfsd often requests, easily suffer?
> > i guess explicitly distinguishing sync/async requests like the
> > attached diff makes it better.
> 
> Cool, though I guess BUFQ_READ_PRIO should no longer be the name of the 
> queueing discipline... perhaps just BUFQ_PRIO?

i think it's better to leave BUFQ_READ_PRIO as-is and create a new one
for people who like benchmarks... :)

YAMAMOTO Takashi