On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:53:36AM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> 
> On Dec 16, 2003, at 2:30 PM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> 
> >atabus is really very little code. It can be moved anywhere else 
> >without
> >problems. But it may not be worth the trouble to try to share it with
> >SATA, especially as it has a different probe routine.
> 
> There is a very good reason to split out the atabus code that I forgot 
> to mention before...
> 
> If you want to have the probe-order enforced, you must do this.

You mean, between the SATA and PATA controllers ?
We already have this problem between atapibus and scsibus, so a more general
solution is needed anyway :)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 23 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--