>> uintptr_t isn't wide enough for this particular purpose (and i'm not
>> sure why unsigned long isn't simply sufficient in either case).
>
>It's not so much about having an adequately-sized type but about
>having a fixed-width one.  Having a netbsd32 ps(1) work on a 64-bit
>machine is quite convenient.

no, i know about the netbsd32 thing.  i was just pondering the fact
that uintptr_t isn't merely an unsigned long on all platforms.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
werdna@squooshy.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."