Subject: Re: statfs, statvfs and friends.
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/31/2004 11:02:23
christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> int64_t f_bavail; /* free blocks avail to non-superuser */
I'd like to have equivalent always non-negative value field like # of
reserved blocks for super user, and deprecate the use of f_bavail at
least in our tree.
> 2b. Q: X/Open says we should use unsigned long for bsize, frsize and
> fsblkcnt_t for the rest. Should we do that?
> A: I say keep the types as I have them.
do `the rest' includes f_bavail?
enami.