On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 00:05:44 +0200, Lennart Augustsson wrote:

> Jonathan Stone wrote:
> 
> > At this point I could mumble about how kcont is (modulo the
> > limitations of C) isomorphic, to a Common-Lisp manual translation
> > into continuation-passing style (CSP) rather than true
> > Scheme-style continations.
> 
> Which is a good thing!  I wouldn't advocate being able to reify the
> current continuation in a place where you have resource constraints,
> like a kernel. :-)

Mmm, TCP stack that uses downward continuations to retransmit... ;)

SY, Uwe
-- 
uwe@ptc.spbu.ru                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/            |       Ist zu Grunde gehen