Subject: Re: fs transcoding, was Re: Unicode support in iso9660.
To: Pavel Cahyna <pavel.cahyna@st.cuni.cz>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/22/2004 08:14:39
--Apple-Mail-4-426312065
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Nov 22, 2004, at 8:06 AM, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:01:37 +0000, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
>> Honestly, I think we need to reserve a chunk of space in the FFS
>> superblock to specify the encoding that the file system is using.
>
> What would be this good for?
Making it possible for the file system to self-describe. The "what
we've got" part of the equation. Legacy file systems that don't
specify this can continue their free-for-all wrt. encoding that makes
this problem difficult to solve. New file systems will have a
reasonable default encoding (UTF-8), and it can be set at newfs time to
an alternate encoding or "none" (i.e. the legacy case).
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
--Apple-Mail-4-426312065
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBohBwOpVKkaBm8XkRAhA8AKDNEphG6xapA4r6h0jLloPiCTNlsACgng0o
+CP+doox6hlO0KM76NkBbIk=
=cugV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail-4-426312065--