Subject: Re: representation of persistent device status, was Re: devfs, was Re: ptyfs...
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/24/2004 13:50:29
--Apple-Mail-17-619262115
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Nov 19, 2004, at 2:56 PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> I know of certain applications where old-style nodes in the fs is an
> absolute, non-negotiable requirement, and for which the proposed devfs
> is an absolute non-starter.
Give me an example. That sounds absolutely ridiculous to me.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
--Apple-Mail-17-619262115
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBpQIqOpVKkaBm8XkRAkXMAJ9hWxI1EOIxtcgVujUtMyn9L/AeHACg0Guh
MzfKF6hraRjBL9sy4bnaOMI=
=UAd6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail-17-619262115--