Subject: re: Why /dev/bpf rather than /dev/bpf0?
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/08/2004 21:14:22 
On Dec 9,  1:13pm, mrg@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: Why /dev/bpf rather than /dev/bpf0?

|    Besides, we can easily make a bpf0 -> bpf symlink for compatibility.
|    
|    (Not that I think we should, but we can.)
| 
| 
| i think we should at least for one release.

Ok, that is easy enough.

christos