--i3lJ51RuaGWuFYNw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:18:47PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> >The tun/tap mode uses a device such as ethfoo which emulates a complete
> >Ethernet segment between the host.  It makes it appear as a separate
> >computer which, for example, would be linked to the host with a cross-
> >over cable.
> >
> >While I haven't tried it, I don't see anything that could prevent two
> >instances of qemu from doing network communication that way, the host
> >will server as a router in that situation.
>=20
> Ah... no go to have that on the same subnet, e.g. maybe bridge on the=20
> host, instead of route? FWIW, simh-vax just works for this kind of=20
> setup...

Using bridge(4) over two ethfoo(4) should work.  It's actually an
interesting test to do, I'll try that by tonight.

Making it possible for ethfoo to do bridging would introduce a lot of
complexity (it would have to know a lot about Ethernet).

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"Commala-come-five! / Even when the shadows rise!
To see the world and walk the world / Makes ya glad to be alive."
Susannah's Song, The Dark Tower VI, Stephen King, 2004.

--i3lJ51RuaGWuFYNw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQb2HlNgoQloHrPnoAQJV1QgAqXuUEbHF0yvTX1CuIm/U5c3DcuqvZaJS
XVDSr5ys/AFjwuP06FjQDUjsK9XnjPm9FEsrScpQ5MRGs3MIswE8fEHrjkqtbpSc
0AymqOCXZAxFKEpOzdnggYBg5I5eiFI8TAk00Dl1rgz+tJ1+Yb3mgEG4pVl4edp+
Wl3I7KIZJL51XNQEbOPuslQkg2CTaWdalov0bXVV/SWVepx4iQpez1wRGJeWSZEP
4Y6k18jww26bUKtrf8hOEMsnLEp4p0w9d23Gun7jjKu5Ya+WD/Z5EUW7J+NKQPCi
8x3LDfllnZ23GUeKtxHgJIkUXpAFRHUQ9Z5CdbjJk7TGBy3IIeOvuA==
=kOAT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--i3lJ51RuaGWuFYNw--